Electrohydrodynamic dryer: Effect of emitters’ density and gap between discharge and collecting electrodes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the results of experimental study and mathematical simulation of multi-pin electrohydrodynamic dryer as a function of emitters’ density and a gap between discharge and collecting electrodes. Experimental data for multi-pin electrodes with different emitters’ spacing 1 × 1, 2 × 2, 3 × 3, 4 × 4, 6 × 6 cm and different gaps between electrodes at 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, and 4.0 cm have been approximated with Warburg and Stuetzer models. Stuetzer model appears to be more accurate fit to experimental data for all electrode geometries. It also allowed decomposition of partial effects of emitters’ density and the gap between electrodes. Effect of emitters’ density was accounted through dimensionless geometry factor go. Using modified Stuetzer model, current density of the multi-pin electrode could be predicted as a function of voltage, gap and emitters’ density, which allows scaling up the multi-pin dryers for industrial applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it