MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2949340711 · doi:10.1021/ic010627y

Solution Multi-NMR and Raman Spectroscopic Studies of Thermodynamically Unstable XeO<sub>4</sub>. The First<sup>131</sup>Xe NMR Study of a Chemically Bound Xenon Species

2001· article· en· W2949340711 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Gerken, Gary J. Schrobilgen

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryXenonNMR spectra databaseRaman spectroscopyRelaxation (psychology)Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyPhysical chemistrySolventAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Spectral lineStereochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Xenon tetroxide is thermodynamically unstable, decomposing explosively in the gas phase and in the solid state. A modified and more detailed description of the procedure for the preparation of XeO(4) and its solutions is provided. Xenon tetroxide dissolves in SO(2)ClF, BrF(5), and HF solvents, giving solutions that are kinetically stable up to -30 degrees C. The preparation of kinetically stable XeO(4) solutions lays the groundwork for the solution chemistry of XeO(4) and for the extension of the presently limited chemistry of xenon(VIII). The (129)Xe and (17)O NMR spectra of XeO(4) were observed for the first time, and the tetrahedral symmetry of XeO(4) allowed for the observation of a surprisingly narrow (131)Xe resonance, the first (131)Xe NMR study of a xenon compound. A variable temperature and variable field strength study of the spin-lattice relaxation times for (129)Xe and (131)Xe show that the spin-rotation and the quadrupolar relaxation mechanisms, respectively, are dominant. The Raman spectrum of XeO(4) in anhydrous HF solvent confirms the absence of significant solvent-solute interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207