Splitting Tensile Strength, Physical and Durability Properties of Cement Stabilized Earth Block Reinforced with Treated and Untreated Pineapple Leaf Fibre
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present study, the physical and mechanical strength of cement stabilized earth block reinforced with treated and untreated pineapple leaf fibre (T-PALF, N-PALF) have been studied. Three types of blocks were casted, firstly the block of dimensions 290*140*120mm were casted and these block were casted for abrasion test, secondly the cube blocks of dimensions 150*150*150mm were made and they were casted for water absorption and density test; thirdly were casted cylinder block of dimensions 200*100mm for Splitting tensile strength. It was found that, the water absorption of the blocks increase with increase of fibre content, the density decrease with fibre content. The fibre have increased the abrasion resistance and tensile strength of the blocks up to 3% of fibre content afterward it decreased. It was also observed that, the T-PALF had significantly improved the properties of the blocks comparing to those reinforced with N-PALF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".