MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2949445514 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.044042

Quantum radiation from a sandwich black hole

2017· article· en· W2949445514 on OpenAlexafffund
Valeri P. Frolov, Andrei Zelnikov

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsBlack hole (networking)HorizonContext (archaeology)Mathematical physicsHawking radiationRotating black holeEnergy conditionQuantum mechanicsGeneral relativity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We discuss quantum radiation of a massless scalar field from a spherically symmetric nonsingular black hole with a finite lifetime. Namely, we discuss a sandwich black-hole model, where a black hole is originally created by a collapse of a null shell of mass $M$, and later, after some time $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}V$, it is disrupted by the collapse of the other shell with negative mass $\ensuremath{-}M$. We assume that between the shells the metric is static and either coincides with the Hayward metric or with a special generalization of it. We show that in both cases for a sufficiently large parameter $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Delta}}V$ the radiation after the formation of the black hole practically coincides with the Hawking result. We also calculate the radiation, emitted from the black hole interior. This radiation contains a peak at the moment when the second shell intersects the inner horizon. In the standard sandwich metric (with the Hayward interior) this outburst of energy is exponentially large. In the modified metric, which includes an additional nontrivial redshift parameter, this exponent is suppressed. This is a result of a significant decrease of the surface gravity of the inner horizon in the latter case. We discuss possible consequences of this result in the context of the self-consistency requirement for nonsingular models with quantum radiation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.381 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsFrench-language works237,207