From Perception to Practice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Teaching culture is the product of a dynamic interplay among the embedded patterns, behaviours, values, beliefs and ideologies about teaching and learning within and across the many microcultures that make up a university. Educational researchers from across Canada developed a set of Institutional Teaching Culture Perception Surveys (ITCPS) to gain insight to an institution’s teaching culture at a particular point in time. Staff, faculty, and students from two institutions provided comments through an open-ended survey and focus groups, answering the question “What would indicate to you that teaching matters at your institution?” Aligning with the six ITCPS levers, the results identified both barriers and pathways to a strong institutional teaching culture, highlighting strategic priorities, assessment methods, effective pedagogy, supportive infrastructure, engagement opportunities and public recognition.
 
 La culture d’enseignement est le fruit d’une interaction dynamique entre les habitudes, les comportements, les valeurs, les croyances et les idéologies portant sur l’enseignement et sur l’apprentissage à travers les multiples microcultures qui composent une université. Des chercheurs en éducation de partout au Canada ont mis au point un sondage – appelé ITCPS – sur la perception de la culture d’enseignement afin de mieux comprendre une telle culture dans un établissement donné à un moment précis. Des employés, des enseignants et des étudiants provenant de deux établissements ont formulé des commentaires dans un sondage à questions ouvertes et dans des groupes de discussion. Ils ont répondu à la question suivante : « Qu’est-ce qui vous ferait penser que l’on accorde une valeur à l’enseignement dans votre établissement? » En adéquation avec les six mécanismes du sondage ITCPS, les résultats ont mis en évidence les obstacles et les voies à suivre pour atteindre à une culture d’enseignement forte en établissement, en soulignant les priorités stratégiques, les méthodes d’évaluation, la pédagogie efficace, l’infrastructure de soutien, les possibilités de participation et la reconnaissance publique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".