El viaje de Beatriz -La Sin Ventura-, en la mirada feminista de Alaíde Foppa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En el presente trabajo se presenta parte del análisis al corpus del poema épico La Sin Ventura (1955), escrito por Alaíde Foppa. Este texto se enmarca dentro del género literario de relato de viajes durante la colonia al llamado “Nuevo Mundo”. El interés en su estudio radica en que tanto la escritora como la protagonista de esta obra son figuras históricas importantes para Guatemala, pero poco conocidas o estudiadas. Por un lado, Foppa, académica, poeta, crítica de arte, exiliada, productora de radio y desparecida presuntamente por el ejército guatemalteco en los años 80, fue precursora del feminismo latinoamericano y defensora de los Derechos Humanos. Por el otro, Beatriz de la Cueva fue la esposa del conquistador Pedro de Alvarado y primera gobernadora de la Capitanía General de Guatemala en 1541. En La Sin Ventura, Alaíde Foppa decide recrear la imagen de Beatriz de la Cueva, esposa del conquistador Pedro de Alvarado. Los cronistas Francisco Antonio Fuentes y Guzmán, Fray Antonio de Remesal y Bernal Díaz del Castillo mencionan muy brevemente a la esposa del conquistador en sus escritos. Sin embargo, Foppa utiliza a este personaje histórico como protagonista principal de este poema épico, enmarcado en la Guatemala colonial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".