Properties of Mixing SAC Solder Alloys with Bismuth-Containing Solder Alloys for a Low Reflow Temperature Process
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The subject of extensive research has been the establishing of lower temperature soldering of electronic assemblies that are similar to the once common yet still preferred eutectic Tin-Lead (SnPb) soldering processes that are below 217°C. This research measured and compared the mixing mechanisms of paste and ball dissolution. Mixed soldered assemblies will have different dissolution results that are dependent on the peak refl ow temperature. The hypothesis for this experiment was to determine the relationship of various times above the melting point of low temperature solders containing Bismuth. The results measured are from solder joints of both SAC305 and Bismuth containing solders formed at lower process temperatures compared to the standard high temperatures which peak at 230°C-260°C. The Bismuth containing solders evaluated start with the highest to lowest weight percentage of Bismuth, the eutectic 58Bismuth/42Tin (58Bi/42Sn), 57Bi/42Sn/1Ag and a propriety alloy that has a lower Bismuth content along with various micro alloys, defi ned as 40-58Bi/Sn/X (X representing proprietary micro alloys or doping). The assembly was with an 18mil 96.5Tin/3.0Silver/0.5Copper (SAC305) solder ball mixed with each solder paste. These solder alloys were exposed to three different peak temperatures 180°C, 195°C, 205°C. Another refl ow profi le attribute of focus was times above 138°C - the melting point of the eutectic Sn58Bi alloy, this term used throughout the study is referred to Time Above Melting (TAM). The ball and paste assembly used the times above melting of 120sec and 240sec to represent process extremes and verify their signifi cance on improving mixing level results. The average mixing % levels were recorded and compared for each solder joint combination to test the theory that the solder paste solidifi es during the time above melting (TAM) within the refl ow oven. [1] This experiment effectively demonstrates that the refl ow profi le parameter for time above melting has limited effectiveness in additionally mixing the paste with the BGA solder ball. Optimization of mixing percentages will need to be achieved by optimizing the paste and ball volumes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".