MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2949554457 · doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.06.014

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for thromboembolic prevention, are they safe in congenital heart disease? Results of a worldwide study

2019· article· en· W2949554457 on OpenAlexafffund
Hyeon‐Jong Yang, Berto J. Bouma, Konstantinos Dimopoulos, Paul Khairy, Magalie Ladouceur, Koichiro Niwa, Matthias Greutmann, Markus Schwerzmann, Alexander C. Egbe, Giancarlo Scognamiglio, Werner Budts, Gruschen Veldtman, Alexander R. Opotowsky, Craig S. Broberg, Lina Gumbienė, Folkert J. Meijboom, Tobias Rutz, Martijn C. Post, Tabitha G. Moe, Magdalena Lipczyńska, Shane Tsai, S. Chakrabarti, Daniel Tobler, William Davidson, Marielle Morissens, Arie P.J. van Dijk, Jonathan Buber, Judith Bouchardy, Kristofer Skoglund, Christina Christersson, Thomas Kronvall, Thelma C. Konings, Rafael Alonso-González, Atsushi Mizuno, Gary D. Webb, Monika Laukytė, Gertjan T. Sieswerda, Keri M. Shafer, Jamil Aboulhosn, Barbara J.M. Mulder

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Cardiology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaSt. Paul's HospitalMontreal Heart InstituteUniversité de Montréal
FundersNederlandse Federatie van Universitair Medische CentraBoehringer IngelheimBayerInstitut de Cardiologie de MontréalPfizerDaiichi-SankyoBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsMedicineVitamin K antagonistAntagonistThromboembolic diseaseEdoxabanHeart diseaseCardiologyDiseaseInternal medicineIntensive care medicineRivaroxabanAtrial fibrillationWarfarinThrombosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines consider vitamin K antagonists (VKA) the oral anticoagulant agents of choice in adults with atrial arrhythmias (AA) and moderate or complex forms of congenital heart disease, significant valvular lesions, or bioprosthetic valves, pending safety data on non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Therefore, the international NOTE registry was initiated to assess safety, change in adherence and quality of life (QoL) associated with NOACs in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD). METHODS: An international multicenter prospective study of NOACs in ACHD was established. Follow-up occurred at 6 months and yearly thereafter. Primary endpoints were thromboembolism and major bleeding. Secondary endpoints included minor bleeding, change in therapy adherence (≥80% medication refill rate, ≥6 out of 8 on Morisky-8 questionnaire) and QoL (SF-36 questionnaire). RESULTS: In total, 530 ACHD patients (mean age 47 SD 15 years; 55% male) with predominantly moderate or complex defects (85%), significant valvular lesions (46%) and/or bioprosthetic valves (11%) using NOACs (rivaroxaban 43%; apixaban 39%; dabigatran 12%; edoxaban 7%) were enrolled. The most common indication was AA (91%). Over a median follow-up of 1.0 [IQR 0.0-2.0] year, thromboembolic event rate was 1.0% [95%CI 0.4-2.0] (n = 6) per year, with 1.1% [95%CI 0.5-2.2] (n = 7) annualized rate of major bleeding and 6.3% [95%CI 4.5-8.5] (n = 37) annualized rate of minor bleeding. Adherence was sufficient during 2 years follow-up in 80-93% of patients. At 1-year follow-up, among the subset of previous VKA-users who completed the survey (n = 33), QoL improved in 6 out of 8 domains (p ≪ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Initial results from our worldwide prospective study suggest that NOACs are safe and may be effective for thromboembolic prevention in adults with heterogeneous forms of congenital heart disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations82
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of CardiologySame topicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsFrench-language works237,207