MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2949602933 · doi:10.82308/1506

Statistical downscaling of daily and hourly climate scenarios for the various meteorological variables at Montreal

2018· article· en· W2949602933 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bhargob Deka

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDownscalingScale (ratio)ClimatologyEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyLinear regressionGCM transcription factorsClimate changeClimate modelRegression analysisComputer scienceGeneral Circulation ModelPrecipitationGeographyMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A lot of research has been carried out using statistical methods in downscaling large-scale GCM outputs to the local site or small-scale region. Using statistical methods, empirical relationships are developed between the large-scale GCM outputs and the local site weather variables. In this methodology, it is assumed that these empirical relationships will also hold true even in the future periods of time. Environmental assessment studies for the future decade under the influence of a changing climate is the need of the hour. In order to identify the future synoptic weather types, future daily and hourly projections of the weather variables are required. Hence, this research is motivated by the lack of a comprehensive and statistically significant downscaling methodology for the various weather variables. The present study is based on the various statistical downscaling techniques developed by the researchers in the past using linear regression model because of the advantage of being less computationally intensive. In addition, an attempt has been made to develop an improved statistical downscaling methodology by combining different techniques to develop a robust method with a detailed performance assessment of the models. Linear Regression models are derived to downscale daily climate scenarios using NCEP reanalysis datasets for the predictors and weather station data available at Trudeau International Airport for the predictands during the reference period 1958-2001. The NCEP predictors are regridded to the GCM scale as the GCM outputs are to be used for deriving future climate projections. Standardization and Deseasonalization of the predictor variables are carried out followed by principal component analysis prior to their introduction into the stepwise regression model. CANESM2 is selected as the GCM model in the present work whose outputs are used as predictors in the NCEP derived regression models. A Bias Correction procedure is used to correct the systematic biases present using a quantile-quantile mapping technique on the downscaled variable using CANESM2 predictors. After downscaling the daily climate variables, hourly downscaling transfer functions are derived based on the historical relationships of the hourly values with its daily mean as well as other weather predictors where appropriate. For the future climate projections, RCP2.6, 4.5 and 8.5 are used as greenhouse gas trajectories representing the change in climate in the future decade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicClimate variability and models→French-language works237,207→