Ennobling an Old Molecule: Thiazyl Trifluoride (N≡SF<sub>3</sub>), a Versatile Synthon for Xe–N Bond Formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fields of sulfur-nitrogen-fluorine chemistry and noble-gas chemistry have been significantly extended by the syntheses and characterizations of four new Xe-N-bonded cations derived from N≡SF(3). The adduct-cation, F(3)S≡NXeF(+), has provided the entry point to a significant chemistry through HF solvolysis of the coordinated N≡SF(3) ligand and HF-catalyzed and solid-state rearrangements of F(3)S≡NXeF(+). The HF solvolyses of [F(3)S≡NXeF][AsF(6)] in anhydrous HF (aHF) and aHF/BrF(5) solutions yield the F(4)S═NXe(+) cation, which likely arises from an HF-catalyzed mechanism. The F(4)S═NXe(+) cation, in turn, undergoes HF displacement to form F(4)S═NH(2)(+) and XeF(2), as well as HF addition to the S═N bond to form F(5)SN(H)Xe(+). Both cations undergo further solvolyses in aHF to form the F(5)SNH(3)(+) cation. The F(4)S═NXe(+) and F(4)S═NH(2)(+) cations were characterized by NMR spectroscopy and single-crystal X-ray diffraction and exhibit high barriers to rotation about their S═N double bonds. They are the first cations known to contain the F(4)S═N- group and significantly extend the chemistry of this ligand. The solid-state rearrangement of [F(3)S≡NXeF][AsF(6)] at 22 °C has yielded [F(4)S═NXe][AsF(6)], which was characterized by Raman spectroscopy, providing the first examples of xenon bonded to an imido nitrogen and of the F(4)S═N- group bonded to a noble-gas element. The rearrangement of [F(3)S≡NXeF][AsF(6)] in a N≡SF(3) solution at 0 °C also yielded [F(4)S═NXe−N≡SF(3)][AsF(6)], which represents a rare example of a N−Xe−N linkage and the first to be characterized by X-ray crystallography. Solvolysis of N≡SF(3) in aHF was previously shown to give the primary amine F(5)SNH(2), whereas solvolysis in the superacid medium, AsF(5)/aHF, results in amine protonation to give [F(5)SNH(3)][AsF(6)]. Complete structural characterizations were not available for either species. Isolation of F(5)SNH(2)·nHF from the reaction of N≡SF(3) with HF has provided a structural characterization of F(5)SNH(2) by Raman spectroscopy. Crystal growth by sublimation of F(5)SNH(2)·nHF at -30 to -40 °C has resulted in the X-ray crystal structure of F(5)SNH(2)·2[F(5)SNH(3)][HF(2)]·4HF and structural characterizations of F(5)SNH(2) and F(5)SNH(3)(+). The redox decomposition of [F(4)S═NXe−N≡SF(3)][AsF(6)] in N≡SF(3) at 0 °C generated Xe, cis-N(2)F(2), and [F(3)S(N≡SF(3))(2)][AsF(6)].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".