MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2949709028 · doi:10.1353/vcr.2018.0003

A Masterwork of a Great British Sculptor: The Titanic Memorial in Belfast

2018· article· en· W2949709028 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
James Stevens Curl

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian review · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIrish and British Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWifeHistoryArt historyNorthern irelandPridePerformance artArchaeologyArtCartographyGeographyLawEthnologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Masterwork of a Great British Sculptor: The Titanic Memorial in Belfast James Stevens Curl (bio) Early in the morning of 15 April 1912, the White Star liner RMS Titanic (then the largest ship afloat), having struck an iceberg, sank on her maiden voyage from Southampton to New York City. The force of the collision apparently buckled the plates and popped the rivets (although there are other theories concerning the cause and effects). The loss of over fifteen hundred lives was a disaster seared into British national consciousness, with particular resonances in Southampton and, especially, in Belfast, where the shipyard (then the largest in the world) of Harland & Wolff, builders of the Titanic and her sister ships, Olympic and Britannic, was situated. Within a few days of news of the catastrophe reaching Belfast, it was proposed that the local victims should be commemorated with a memorial, and Belfast Corporation passed a motion to that effect on 1 May 1912: the City of Belfast recognized “with unbounded pride” that in the “hour of trial the fortitude of her sons failed not,” and although the city mourned [End Page 12] her dead, she rejoiced “in having given to the world men who could so nobly die” (qtd. in Barczewski 222). A proposal that a memorial should be erected was formally tabled on 3 May 1912 at a meeting in the city hall chaired by the distinguished philanthropist and politician Julia McMordie, wife of Ronald James McMordie (the lord mayor of Belfast); the McMordies had both been present at the well-publicized launch of Titanic the previous June (McCaughan 90), an event that celebrated the achievements of Belfast’s industry and craftsmanship at a time when anxieties about the future of Ulster were stirring grave political upheavals and violent passions. Very soon, it was resolved to erect an “appropriate public Memorial . . . on the most prominent site available” in order to “keep green” the memory of those lost and to record their “heroism” and their “devotion to duty” (Cameron 83). The matter of the design and character of the monument was referred to a special subcommittee for consideration and, by the end of the following month, over £1,000 had been raised, of which around a third was donated by the public: £200 was donated by employees of Harland & Wolff; more than £350 came from members of the Andrews family (Thomas Andrews, Chief Designer and from 1907 Managing Director of Harland & Wolff, went down with the ship); and just over £100 came from the White Star Line (Cameron 83). In July 1912, Mrs. McMordie requested of the Improvement Committee a site for the proposed monument, and the city surveyor reported that a suitable spot was Donegall Square North (Barczewski 222–23). In due course, Sir Thomas Brock was commissioned to design and make the memorial, and he began work once the contract was confirmed by the corporation, in January 1913. Brock had completed many unfinished works begun by his teacher, Irish sculptor John Henry Foley, including the huge monument to Daniel O’Connell in Dublin and the gilded bronze figure of Prince Albert in Kensington Gardens, London, but he was also responsible for the massive Queen Victoria Memorial in front of Buckingham Palace, which earned him his knighthood, in 1911 (Stocker 753–54). The Titanic memorial was not the only contribution Brock made to Belfast’s collection of monumental sculptures: he also made the statue of Queen Victoria that stands in front of Sir Alfred Brumwell Thomas’s city hall, as well as the statue of Sir Edward James Harland in the city hall grounds (Roscoe et al. 467–73). Erection of the memorial was delayed by World War I, and Brock’s wonderful creation (fig. 1) was not put up on its island site in Donegall Square North until June 1920. It was unveiled by Field Marshal Sir John Denton Pinkstone French. The memorial is of Carrara marble, set on a pedestal of granite inscribed with the names of those “gallant Belfast men” who died in the disaster (Cameron 84). They are in shipboard rank rather than alphabetical order, so at the head of the list on one side is the name...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.679
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian reviewSame topicIrish and British StudiesFrench-language works237,207