MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

<i>Herschel</i><sup>★</sup>and JCMT observations of the early-type dwarf galaxy NGC 205

2012· article· en· W2949715866 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of SciencesScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space AgencyMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieVlaamse regeringCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversità degli Studi di PadovaKU LeuvenBundesministerium für Verkehr, Innovation und TechnologieCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekCardiff UniversityCompute CanadaUK Space AgencyUniversity of LethbridgeCalifornia Institute of Technology
KeywordsDwarf galaxyJames Clerk Maxwell TelescopeInterstellar mediumGalaxyStar formationTelescopeIrregular galaxyBrown dwarf

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present Herschel dust continuum, James Clerk Maxwell Telescope CO (3–2) observations and a search for [C ii ] 158 m and [O i ] 63 m spectral line emission for the brightest early-type dwarf satellite of Andromeda, NGC 205. While direct gas measurements [ Mg ∼ 1.5 × 10 6 M ⊙ , H i + CO (1–0)] have proven to be inconsistent with theoretical predictions of the current gas reservoir in NGC 205 (>10 7 M ⊙ ), we revise the missing interstellar medium mass problem based on new gas mass estimates (CO (3–2), [C ii ], [O i ]) and indirect measurements of the interstellar medium content through dust continuum emission. Based on Herschel observations, covering a wide wavelength range from 70 to 500 m, we are able to probe the entire dust content in NGC 205 ( M ⊙ at Td ∼ 18–22 K) and rule out the presence of a massive cold dust component ( M ⊙ , Td ∼ 12 K), which was suggested based on millimetre observations from the inner 18.4 arcsec. Assuming a reasonable gas-to-dust ratio of ∼400, the dust mass in NGC 205 translates into a gas mass Mg ∼ 4–7 × 10 6 M ⊙ . The non-detection of [O i ] and the low L[C II] -to- LCO(1-0) line intensity ratio (∼1850) imply that the molecular gas phase is well traced by CO molecules in NGC 205. We estimate an atomic gas mass of 1.5 × 10 4 M ⊙ associated with the [C ii ] emitting photodissociation regions in NGC 205. From the partial CO (3–2) map of the northern region in NGC 205, we derive a molecular gas mass of M ⊙ . Upon comparison with the molecular gas mass estimated from CO (1–0) observations ( M ⊙ ), we find most of the H 2 gas in NGC 205 to be locked in diffuse regions of low density and/or temperature, characteristic for an interstellar medium with little star formation activity. New total gas mass estimates from Herschel dust continuum (4–7 × 10 6 M ⊙ ), Herschel [C ii ] line spectroscopic mapping (1.5 × 10 4 M ⊙ ) and James Clerk Maxwell Telescope CO (3–2) observations (7 × 10 5 M ⊙ ), including the H i mass ( M ⊙ ) and a correction for heavier elements, confirm the deficiency of the interstellar medium (gas+dust) in the inner regions of NGC 205, which is predicted to contain at least >10 7 M ⊙ of gas if we assume a reasonable star formation efficiency of 10 per cent and account for the mass return from planetary nebulae. In an attempt to explain the missing interstellar medium mass problem, we claim that efficient supernova feedback capable of expelling gas from the inner, star-forming regions to the outer regions and/or tidal interactions with M31 stripping the gas component from the galaxy provide the best explanation for the removal of a significant amount of gas and dust from NGC 205.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→