Free-energy cost of localizing a single monomer of a confined polymer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We describe a simple Monte Carlo simulation method to calculate the free-energy cost of localizing a single monomer of a polymer confined to a cavity. The localization position is chosen to be on the inside surface of the confining cavity. The method is applied to a freely jointed hard-sphere polymer chain confined to cavities of spherical and cubic geometries. In the latter case, we consider localization at a corner and at the center of a face of the confining cube. We consider cases of end-monomer localization both with and without tethering of the other end monomer to a point on the surface. We also examine localization of monomers at arbitrary positions along the contour of the polymer. We characterize the dependence of the free energy on the cavity size and shape, the localization position, and the polymer length. The quantitative trends can be understood using standard scaling arguments and use of a simple theoretical model. The results are relevant to those theories of polymer translocation that focus on the importance of the free-energy barrier as the translocation process requires an initial localization of a monomer to the position of a nanopore.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".