MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2949970111 · doi:10.1055/s-0034-1380156

Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions of Cyclopropanols

2015· article· en· W2949970111 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSynlett · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCyclopropane Reaction Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryPalladiumHalideCatalysisArylCoupling reactionCoupling (piping)Organic chemistryAlkyl

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Strained alcohols have featured prominently in a wide array of transition-metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions, but methods involving cyclopropanols have only been developed relatively recently. In this account, we describe our group’s work in this area, and we provide a concise summary of other palladium-catalyzed methods for C–C bond-forming reactions using cyclopropanols. 1 Introduction 2 Cross-Coupling Reactions Using Strained Tertiary Alcohols 3 Base- or Acid-Mediated Ring-Opening Reactions of Strained Alcohols 4 Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions of Cyclopropanols 4.1 Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions of Cyclopropanols with Aryl Halides 4.2 Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions of Cyclopropanols with Benzyl Halides 4.3 Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions of Cyclopropanols with Acyl Halides 4.4 Direct Arylation Using Cyclopropanol-Derived Palladium Homo­enolates 4.5 Synthesis of Quinolines from Cyclopropanols 5 Conclusions

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.812

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it