MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2949978637 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.06518

A White-Noise-On-Jerk Motion Prior for Continuous-Time Trajectory Estimation on SE(3)

2018· preprint· en· W2949978637 on OpenAlexaff
Tim Y. Tang, David J. Yoon, Timothy D. Barfoot

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHuman Pose and Action Recognition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJerkAccelerationWhite noiseTrajectoryNoise (video)Constant (computer programming)Motion (physics)Computer scienceControl theory (sociology)Additive white Gaussian noiseMathematicsArtificial intelligenceStatisticsPhysicsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Simultaneous trajectory estimation and mapping (STEAM) offers an efficient approach to continuous-time trajectory estimation, by representing the trajectory as a Gaussian process (GP). Previous formulations of the STEAM framework use a GP prior that assumes white-noise-on-acceleration, with the prior mean encouraging constant body-centric velocity. We show that such a prior cannot sufficiently represent trajectory sections with non-zero acceleration, resulting in a bias to the posterior estimates. This paper derives a novel motion prior that assumes white-noise-on-jerk, where the prior mean encourages constant body-centric acceleration. With the new prior, we formulate a variation of STEAM that estimates the pose, body-centric velocity, and body-centric acceleration. By evaluating across several datasets, we show that the new prior greatly outperforms the white-noise-on-acceleration prior in terms of solution accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicHuman Pose and Action RecognitionFrench-language works237,207