MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2949988365 · doi:10.3934/dcdss.2020131

Stability analysis of an equation with two delays and application to the production of platelets

2019· article· en· W2949988365 on OpenAlexaff
Boullu Loïs, Laurent Pujo-Menjouet, Jacques Bélair

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversité de Montréal
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsHopf bifurcationMathematicsStability (learning theory)Differential equationPopulationTorusBifurcationParameter spaceCenter manifoldMathematical analysisPhase spaceSteady state (chemistry)Production (economics)Nonlinear systemCharacteristic equationManifold (fluid mechanics)Applied mathematicsPhysicsChemistryStatisticsThermodynamicsGeometryDemographyComputer scienceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyze the stability of a differential equation with two delays originating from a model for a population divided into two subpopulations, immature and mature, and we apply this analysis to a model for platelet production. The dynamics of mature individuals is described by the following nonlinear differential equation with two delays: $ x'(t) = -\gamma x(t) + g(x(t-\tau_1)) - g(x(t-\tau_1 - \tau_2)) e^{-\gamma \tau_2} $. The method of D-decomposition is used to compute the stability regions for a given equilibrium. The centre manifold theory is used to investigate the steady-state bifurcation and the Hopf bifurcation. Similarly, analysis of the centre manifold associated with a double bifurcation is used to identify a set of parameters such that the solution is a torus in the pseudo-phase space. Finally, the results of the local stability analysis are used to study the impact of an increase of the death rate $ \gamma $ or of a decrease of the survival time $ \tau_2 $ of platelets on the onset of oscillations. We show that the stability is lost through a small decrease of survival time (from 8.4 to 7 days), or through an important increase of the death rate (from 0.05 to 0.625 days$ ^{-1} $).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - SSame topicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsFrench-language works237,207