NanoVar: Accurate Characterization of Patients’ Genomic Structural Variants Using Low-Depth Nanopore Sequencing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Despite the increasing relevance of structural variants (SV) in the development of many human diseases, progress in novel pathological SV discovery remains impeded, partly due to the challenges of accurate and routine SV characterization in patients. The recent advent of third-generation sequencing (3GS) technologies brings promise for better characterization of genomic aberrations by virtue of having longer reads. However, the applications of 3GS are restricted by their high sequencing error rates and low sequencing throughput. To overcome these limitations, we present NanoVar, an accurate, rapid and low-depth (4X) 3GS SV caller utilizing long-reads generated by Oxford Nanopore Technologies. NanoVar employs split-reads and hard-clipped reads for SV detection and utilizes a neural network classifier for true SV enrichment. In simulated data, NanoVar demonstrated the highest SV detection accuracy (F1 score = 0.91) amongst other long-read SV callers using 12 gigabases (4X) of sequencing data. In patient samples, besides the detection of genomic aberrations, NanoVar also uncovered many normal alternative sequences or alleles which were present in healthy individuals. The low sequencing depth requirements of NanoVar enable the use of Nanopore sequencing for accurate SV characterization at a lower sequencing cost, an approach compatible with clinical studies and large-scale SV-association research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".