MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950017605 · doi:10.1143/jjap.51.083101

Perfect Domain-Lattice Matching between MgB<sub>2</sub>and Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>: Single-Crystal MgB<sub>2</sub>Thin Films Grown on Sapphire

2012· article· en· W2950017605 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Journal of Applied Physics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSuperconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsLattice constantSapphireSingle crystalLattice (music)Materials scienceThin filmDiffractionCritical currentElectron diffractionCrystallographyChemistrySuperconductivityOpticsPhysicsNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have found that single-crystal films can be grown on (0001) Al 2 O 3 substrates through the golden relation of a perfect lattice-matching ratio (8:3√3) between the a -axis lattice constants of MgB 2 and Al 2 O 3 . Selected-area electron diffraction patterns evidently indicate hexagonal MgB 2 film with a 30° in-plane rotation with respect to the Al 2 O 3 substrate. The critical current density at zero field is comparable to the depairing critical current density and rapidly decreases with increasing applied field owing to the lack of pinning sites, as observed for high-quality MgB 2 single crystals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it