MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Lead-DBS v2: Towards a comprehensive pipeline for deep brain stimulation imaging

2018· article· en· W2950023299 on OpenAlexaff
Andreas Horn, Ningfei Li, Till A. Dembek, Ari D. Kappel, Chadwick Boulay, Siobhán Ewert, Anna Tietze, Andreas Husch, Thushara Perera, Wolf‐Julian Neumann, Marco Reisert, Hang Si, Robert Oostenveld, Chris Rorden, Fang‐Cheng Yeh, Qianqian Fang, Todd M. Herrington, Johannes Vorwerk, Andrea A. Kühn

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroImage · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
FundersNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchNational Cancer InstituteNational Institute of Mental HealthState Government of VictoriaNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringColonial FoundationDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Institutes of HealthMedtronicAmerican Brain FoundationNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of General Medical SciencesMassachusetts General HospitalAmerican Academy of NeurologyMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsDeep brain stimulationPipeline (software)Lead (geology)NeuroscienceNeuroimagingBrain stimulationStimulationComputer sciencePsychologyMedicineGeologyInternal medicinePaleontologyParkinson's disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations774
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNeuroImageSame topicNeurological disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207