MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950048158 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1404.3328

Myopic Bounds for Optimal Policy of POMDPs: An extension of Lovejoy's structural results

2014· preprint· en· W2950048158 on OpenAlexafffund
Vikram Krishnamurthy, Udit Pareek

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2014
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicReinforcement Learning in Robotics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsExtension (predicate logic)Bounded functionMarkov decision processMathematical optimizationRelaxation (psychology)Mathematical economicsUpper and lower boundsMathematicsComputer scienceMarkov processEconomicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper provides a relaxation of the sufficient conditions, and also an extension of the structural results for Partially Observed Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs) given in Lovejoy (1987). Sufficient conditions are provided so that the optimal policy can be upper and lower bounded by judiciously chosen myopic policies. These myopic policy bounds are constructed to maximize the volume of belief states where they coincide with the optimal policy. Numerical examples illustrate these myopic bounds for both continuous and discrete observation sets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.631
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicReinforcement Learning in RoboticsFrench-language works237,207