MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950061144 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.04755

Aerial navigation in obstructed environments with embedded nonlinear model predictive control

2018· preprint· en· W2950061144 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Elias Small, Pantelis Sopasakis, Emil Fresk, Panagiotis Patrinos, George Nikolakopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKU LeuvenVlaamse regeringEuropean CommissionQueen's UniversityFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSQueen's University Belfast
KeywordsModel predictive controlControl theory (sociology)Obstacle avoidanceComputer scienceNonlinear systemSimple (philosophy)ObstacleReduction (mathematics)Nonlinear modelControl engineeringControl (management)EngineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligenceMobile robotRobotPhysicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a methodology for autonomous aerial navigation and obstacle avoidance of micro aerial vehicles (MAV) using nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) and we demonstrate its effectiveness with laboratory experiments. The proposed methodology can accommodate obstacles of arbitrary, potentially non-convex, geometry. The NMPC problem is solved using PANOC: a fast numerical optimization method which is completely matrix-free, is not sensitive to ill conditioning, involves only simple algebraic operations and is suitable for embedded NMPC. A C89 implementation of PANOC solves the NMPC problem at a rate of 20Hz on board a lab-scale MAV. The MAV performs smooth maneuvers moving around an obstacle. For increased autonomy, we propose a simple method to compensate for the reduction of thrust over time, which comes from the depletion of the MAV's battery, by estimating the thrust constant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.615
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.154
Teacher spread0.138 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207