Sulfenate Substitution as a Complement and Alternative to Sulfoxidation in the Diastereoselective Preparation of Chiral β-Substituted β-Amino Sulfoxides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Building from a previous communication, the reaction of sulfenate anions with chiral N-Boc-protected β-substituted β-amino iodides was evaluated as a conceptually different synthetic approach to chiral β-substituted β-amino sulfoxides. Using arenesulfenates, yields typically ranged from 71% to 92%, and dr's were often near 9:1. Alkanesulfenates proved less reactive, delivering lower yields and dr's. 1-Alkenesulfenates demonstrated high reactivity, returning chemical yields of 60-86% and dr's often close to 9:1 and as high as 95:5. (S)-β-Amino iodide electrophiles yielded (R(S),S(C))-β-amino sulfoxides, whereas (R)-amino iodides afford (S(S),R(C))-β-amino sulfoxides. The absolute configuration of the products makes the sulfenate protocol complementary to other existing preparations, including the commonly employed sulfoxidation of β-amino sulfides. The reactivity of N-Boc-protected 2-benzyl-2-aminoethyl iodide was found to be superior to the less sterically encumbered n-butyl iodide. A transition state model is proposed to account for the stereochemistry of the products and also for the high reactivity of the electrophile. Overall, the chemistry represents a new means of introducing sulfur stereogenicity in a molecule.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".