La politique de communication de la Commission a-t-elle créé un espace public européen interculturel ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’Union européenne (UE) est un espace politique intéressant pour analyser les points de contact entre recherche sur la communication internationale et la recherche sur la communication interculturelle. En effet, l’Union européenne est évidemment, avec 28 pays (bientôt 27), un espace où se déploie une communication internationale multilingue. C’est aussi une institution politique qui cherche à faire advenir un espace public interculturel devant permettre de légitimer une construction politique « unie dans la diversité » (devise de l’UE). Ce but institutionnel est-il atteint? La politique de communication mise en œuvre par l’exécutif de l’UE (la Commission européenne) à destination de 500 millions d’Européens peut-elle favoriser la création d’un espace de médiation et d’engagement qui soit à la fois commun et respectueux de la diversité culturelle? L’objet de cet article est de répondre à cette question.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.022 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".