MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950109682 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0807.4505

Bounds on Kolmogorov spectra for the Navier - Stokes equations

2008· preprint· en· W2950109682 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrei Biryuk, Walter Craig

Bibliographic record

VenueArXiv.org · 2008
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNavier-Stokes equation solutions
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsKolmogorov equations (Markov jump process)Spectral lineMathematicsNavier–Stokes equationsPhysicsStatistical physicsApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisMechanicsCompressibilityQuantum mechanicsDifferential equation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let $u(x,t)$ be a (possibly weak) solution of the Navier - Stokes equations on all of ${\mathbb R}^3$, or on the torus ${\mathbb R}^3/ {\mathbb Z}^3$. The {\it energy spectrum} of $u(\cdot,t)$ is the spherical integral \[ E(κ,t) = \int_{|k| = κ} |\hat{u}(k,t)|^2 dS(k), \qquad 0 \leq κ< \infty, \] or alternatively, a suitable approximate sum. An argument involking scale invariance and dimensional analysis given by Kolmogorov (1941) and Obukhov (1941) predicts that large Reynolds number solutions of the Navier - Stokes equations in three dimensions should obey \[ E(κ, t) \sim C_0\varepsilon^{2/3}κ^{-5/3} \] over an inertial range $κ_1 \leq κ\leq κ_2$, at least in an average sense. We give a global estimate on weak solutions in the norm $\|{\mathcal F}\partial_x u(\cdot, t)\|_\infty$ which gives bounds on a solution's ability to satisfy the Kolmogorov law. A subsequent result is for rigorous upper and lower bounds on the inertial range, and an upper bound on the time of validity of the Kolmogorov spectral regime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.508
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.269
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.124 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArXiv.orgSame topicNavier-Stokes equation solutionsFrench-language works237,207