MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950125042 · doi:10.1002/chin.201509005

ChemInform Abstract: Nuclear and Magnetic Supercells in the Multiferroic Candidate: Pb<sub>3</sub>TeMn<sub>3</sub>P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>14</sub>.

2015· article· en· W2950125042 on OpenAlexaff
H. J. Silverstein, Ashfia Huq, Minseong Lee, Eun Sang Choi, Haidong Zhou, C. R. Wiebe

Bibliographic record

VenueChemInform · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMultiferroics and related materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiferroicsChemistryCondensed matter physicsNuclear magnetic resonanceNanotechnologyPhysicsFerroelectricityOptoelectronicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The crystal and magnetic structures of the title compound are determined by synchrotron X‐ray and neutron diffraction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemInformSame topicMultiferroics and related materialsFrench-language works237,207