MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950131908

Tall oil production process and characterization

2017· dissertation· en· W2950131908 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Thomas Aro

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNorthern Ontario Heritage Fund Corporation
KeywordsCharacterization (materials science)Production (economics)Process (computing)Manufacturing engineeringProcess engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceMaterials scienceEconomicsNanotechnology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Existing kraft pulp mills have seen the necessity to branch out from traditional pulp and paper products to alternative value-added products such as bioenergy and biomaterials as a result of increasing competition in the forest products industry and the need for divergence from fossil fuels. Consequently, by-products from kraft pulp mills, including tall oil from extractives and modified lignin from black liquor, have seen a rise in valorization recently. \nIn this study, tall oil soap was received from a kraft pulp mill and transformed via acidification to crude tall oil. The reaction conditions of water content, reaction pH, reaction time, along with the application of settling additives were varied in order to determine optimized conditions. Optimized conditions without the use of settling additives were 100 wt.% H2O, pH of 2.5 ? 3.0, reaction time of 20 min, and incorporated industrially accepted values of reaction temperature (90 ? 100 ?C) and settling time (2 h). \nWhen employing settling additives, both anionic and cationic polymers were tested. The InfinityTM PS 3040 Pulp Processing Aid was an anionic polymer with the charge density -4.73 mmol/g and a molecular weight of 7.00 x 104 g/mol. When employed at a dry basis dosage of 0.0185 wt.% (0.05 wt.% wet basis), it produced crude tall oil with a 57.1 wt.% yield and an acid number of 142 mg KOH/g oil, based on the initial amount of raw soap added. These were increased compared to crude tall oil produced with no additive with a yield of 52.9 wt.% and acid number of 137 mg KOH/g oil. The second settling additive was xylan-AETAS-APS, a cationic xylan copolymer with a charge density of 3.81 mmol/g and molecular weight of 1.26 x 105 g/mol. The yield of crude tall oil was optimized with a dry dosage of 0.01109 wt.% (0.03 wt.% wet dosage), at 53.7 wt.%. A maximum acid number of 138 mg KOH/g oil was achieved with a dry dosage of 0.00729 wt.% (0.02 wt.% wet). Finally, an H-lignin copolymer, DMC-HL10, with a cationic charge density of 3.47 mmol/g and a preliminary molecular weight of approximately 32,000 g/mol was employed. With a dry dosage of 0.0037 wt.% (0.01 wt.% wet), a crude tall oil yield of 53.1 wt.% and acid number of 136 mg KOH/g oil were produced. Ultimately, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) analysis determined that no statistical optimal conditions were present. \nThe waste lignin from the tall oil production process was also characterized by charge density, solubility, CHNS, and molecular weight analysis, in order to determine if sulfonation with sulfuric acid during tall oil production had occurred. It was found that the anionic charge density increased from approximately 0 with unmodified kraft lignin to 0.2 ? 0.4 mmol/g depending on the production process of tall oil. There was an increase in solubility from approximately 0 g/L to over nearly 2 g/L and an increase in sulfur content from as low as 0.23 wt.% to a maximum of 2.1 wt.%. Molecular weight of tall oil lignin was found to be approximately 1,700 g/mol, i.e. lower than those of unmodified kraft lignin (up to 25,000 g/mol) and lignosulfonates (up to 150,000 g/mol). Thus, it can be inferred that sulfonated kraft lignin may be produced from waste tall oil lignin, but further studies must be conducted before determining potential implementation in industrial processes such as dispersion and flocculation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University)Same topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207