MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950236406 · doi:10.1021/cm0506151

Structure and Physical Properties of Ternary Antimonide YbCrSb<sub>3</sub>

2005· article· en· W2950236406 on OpenAlexaff
Shane J. Crerar, Laura Deakin, Arthur Mar

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry of Materials · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRare-earth and actinide compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsostructuralAntimonideOrthorhombic crystal systemTernary operationAntiferromagnetismCrystallographyMaterials scienceMagnetizationFerromagnetismElectrical resistivity and conductivityCrystal structureSingle crystalMagnetic susceptibilitySpace groupX-ray crystallographyCondensed matter physicsChemistryDiffractionMetallurgyMagnetic fieldPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ternary rare-earth antimonide YbCrSb 3 was prepared by arc-melting of the elements. Its structure was determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (Pearson symbol oP 20, orthorhombic, space group Pbcm, Z = 4, a = 12.981(3) Å, b = 6.140(1) Å, c = 5.993(1) Å). YbCrSb 3 is isostructural to LaCrSb 3 and CeCrSb 3, and extends the RE CrSb 3 series (previously known for RE = La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy) to the latest rare-earth member yet and to one that is essentially divalent instead of trivalent. Electrical resistivity measurements on single crystals and magnetic susceptibility measurements on powders revealed a magnetic ordering transition at T C = ∼280 K, the highest observed so far in the RE CrSb 3 series. The isothermal magnetization at 100 K indicated an approach to saturation, but with low values (0.08 μ B /mol at 9 T). These results suggest a ferromagnetic or canted antiferromagnetic structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry of MaterialsSame topicRare-earth and actinide compoundsFrench-language works237,207