MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950242081 · doi:10.1111/imj.1_14296

POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES IN CHRONIC DIALYSIS PATIENTS: A META‐ANALYSIS OF 42 STUDIES AND 78,805 PATIENTS

2019· article· en· W2950242081 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternal Medicine Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMeta-analysisDialysisIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Chronic kidney disease is an independent risk factor for postoperative mortality, with an effect similar to that of diabetes mellitus or ischemic heart disease. However, the prognostic significance of dialysis‐dependence chronic kidney disease on perioperative outcomes, and its interaction with comorbid conditions is unclear.\n\nAim: The aim of this study was to estimate the excess risk of postoperative mortality in patients receiving chronic dialysis undergoing elective non‐transplant surgery compared to those with normal kidney function, and to examine the influence on comorbidities on mortality risk.\n\nMethods: Two authors independently performed a systematic review of studies published up to 2018 was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, DARE, CDSR, NICE, NIHR HTA databases. Eligible studies reported postoperative outcomes in patients on chronic dialysis and patients with normal kidney function undergoing major non‐transplant surgery. Non‐dialysis chronic kidney disease patients were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale. Mortality risk estimates over all studies and according to surgical discipline were obtained using random effects meta‐analysis Meta‐regression analysis was performed to explore heterogeneity and assess associations of mortality with age, and comorbidities including ischemic heart disease and diabetes mellitus. (PROSPERO CRD42017076565)\n\nResults: Forty‐two studies involving 78,805 chronic dialysis and 9,984,469 non‐dialysis patients undergoing orthopaedic, vascular, cardiothoracic, general and urological procedures were included. Cohort selection and outcome ascertainment were of good quality, but comparability was poor. Absolute mortality rate varied from 0%‐8·9% in chronic dialysis patients and 0%‐3·9% in patients with normal kidney function across surgical disciplines. Patients on dialysis had a greatly increased postoperative mortality risk compared to patients with normal kidney function following all types of elective surgery (odds ratio [OR] 5·70, 95% CI 4·63 – 7·01). Adjustment for age and comorbidity attenuated this risk (OR 3·13, 95% CI 2·91 ‐ 3·34 I 290%). There was an inverse linear relationship between excess mortality risk and study‐level mean age (slope ‐0·06; P = 0·001), diabetes prevalence (slope ‐0·02; p = 0·001) and ischemic heart disease (slope ‐0·01; p = 0·049).\n\nConclusions: Patients on chronic dialysis have a greatly increased postoperative mortality risk following elective surgery across all surgical disciplines, with the highest excess risk observed in those without other comorbidities. A comprehensive perioperative risk assessment and risk mitigation is required in patients on chronic dialysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternal Medicine JournalSame topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesFrench-language works237,207