Presynaptic Expression of LRIT3 Transsynaptically Organizes the Postsynaptic Glutamate Signaling Complex Containing TRPM1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Throughout the CNS, interactions between pre- and postsynaptic adhesion molecules establish normal synaptic structure and function. Leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domain-containing proteins are a large family that has a diversity of ligands, and their absence can cause disease. At the first retinal synapse, the absence of LRIT3 expression leads to the disassembly of the postsynaptic glutamate signaling complex (signalplex) expressed on depolarizing bipolar cell (DBC) dendrites. The prevalent view is that assembly of the signalplex results from direct postsynaptic protein:protein interactions. In contrast, we demonstrate that LRIT3 is expressed presynaptically, in rod photoreceptors (rods), and when we restore LRIT3 expression in Lrit3 −/− rods, we restore expression of the postsynaptic glutamate signalplex and rod-driven vision. Our results demonstrate that, in the retina, the LRR-containing protein LRIT3 acts as a transsynaptic organizer of the postsynaptic complex required for normal synaptic function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".