Wireless Resonant Circuits Printed Using Aerosol Jet Deposition for MRI Catheter Tracking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could allow for diagnosis and immediate treatment of ischemic stroke; however, such endovascular catheter-based procedures under MRI guidance are inherently difficult. One major challenge is tracking the tip of the catheter, as standard fabrication methods for building inductively coupled coil markers are rigid and bulky. Here, we report a new approach that uses aerosol jet deposition to three-dimensional (3-D) print an inductively coupled RF coil marker on a polymer catheter. Our approach enables lightweight conforming markers on polymer catheters and these low-profile markers allow the catheter to be more safely navigated in small caliber vessels. Prototype markers with an inductor with the geometry of a double helix are incorporated on catheters for in vitro studies, and we show that these markers exhibit good signal amplification. We report temperature measurements and, finally, demonstrate feasibility in a preliminary in vivo experiment. We provide material properties and electromagnetic simulation performance analysis. This paper presents fully aerosol jet-deposited and functional wireless resonant markers on polymer catheters for use in 3T clinical scanners.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".