Effect of Electroconvulsive Therapy on Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Depressed Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Research has shown large improvements in quality of life after a course of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for severe depressive disorder. The effect of ECT on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in the Australian older population has not been explored. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the impact of ECT on HRQOL in older patients with severe major depression and confirm that ECT in these participants is associated with an improvement in depression and no change in cognition. METHODS: Data on 34 patients from a Public Older Persons Mental Health Service in Queensland were collected. The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were used pre- and post-ECT. The Wilcoxon signed rank test, Friedman test, and Kendall τ correlation coefficient were performed. RESULTS: A significant improvement in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form was demonstrated post-ECT. Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores decreased significantly post-ECT. Montreal Cognitive Assessment score increased significantly post-ECT. Significant results were sustained at the 3-month time point. CONCLUSIONS: An acute course of ECT for severe depressive disorder was associated with clinically and statistically significant improvement in HRQOL. There was also clinical and statistical improvement in depression and no significant decrease in global cognitive function, memory, or executive function domains after ECT compared with baseline. In fact, the cohort showed improvement on measures of cognition post-ECT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".