MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950297081 · doi:10.4000/scolia.995

John Humbley, La néologie terminologique, Limoges

2019· article· fr· W2950297081 on OpenAlexaff
Teresa Lino

Bibliographic record

VenueScolia · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
Topiclinguistics and terminology studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Linguistic Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

John Humbley est professeur émérite à la Sorbonne Paris Université, membre du CILLAC-ARP (EA 3967), cofondateur de la revue Neologica, et professeur invité à l’Université de Vérone. Il est reconnu en France et dans beaucoup d’institutions universitaires pour ses recherches sur la terminologie et la néologie, depuis une trentaine d’années. Selon l’auteur, cet ouvrage sur « la néologie terminologique » essaie de combler une lacune : « L’importance de la néologie dans le cadre de la recherche en...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.008
Scholarly communication0.0050.011
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScoliaSame topiclinguistics and terminology studiesFrench-language works237,207