MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950304479 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.cs/0407058

Communication-Aware Processor Allocation for Supercomputers

2004· preprint· en· W2950304479 on OpenAlex
Michael A. Bender, David P. Bunde, Erik D. Demaine, Sándor P. Fekete, Vitus J. Leung, Henk Meijer, Cynthia A. Phillips

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueArXiv.org · 2004
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceParallel computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper gives processor-allocation algorithms for minimizing the average number of communication hops between the assigned processors for grid architectures, in the presence of occupied cells. The simpler problem of assigning processors on a free grid has been studied by Karp, McKellar, and Wong who show that the solutions have nontrivial structure; they left open the complexity of the problem. The associated clustering problem is as follows: Given n points in Re^d, find k points that minimize their average pairwise L1 distance. We present a natural approximation algorithm and show that it is a 7/4-approximation for 2D grids. For d-dimensional space, the approximation guarantee is 2-(1/2d), which is tight. We also give a polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) for constant dimension d, and report on experimental results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.663
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it