MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950347869 · doi:10.17863/cam.32314

The 3rd Joint Symposium of the International and National Neurotrauma Societies and AANS/CNS Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care August 11–16, 2018 Toronto, Canada

2018· article· en· W2950347869 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueApollo (University of Cambridge) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicText and Document Classification Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisClass (philosophy)TrajectoryArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceLatent class modelBiomarkerMachine learningBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: TBI biomarkers display population-level time-varying kinetics [1] which may be a rich source of pathobiological information [2]. At an individual level, deviations from stereotypical trajectories may represent different pathological processes or secondary insults. A method for discovering such phenotypes may be useful in in- dividualising treatments in real-time. Methods: Serial blood (12hourly) and CSF (6hourly) samples were obtained from seventeen adult patients with severe TBI (Stockholm ethics committee approval #2009/1112-31). S100B and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) concentrations were measured along with blood:CSF albumin quotient Qa as a measure of blood-brain-barrier (BBB) integrity. S100B and NSE concentrations were log-transformed: Equivalent to the assumption of baseline exponential decay. We used trajectory modeling combining a quadratic mixed effects model with latent group analysis to search for characteristic trajectories in the measured parameter. Results: For serum S100B, we discovered two phenotypes with fast and slow kinetics. The fast group corresponded with patients with more severe extracranial injury. For serum NSE, again two phenotypes were discovered; a time-decaying group and another with a peak around day 4. CSF analysis yielded two latent groups for both S100B and NSE: a time-decaying group and another displaying prolonged elevation over several days. Qa data clustered into three groups: two with fast, slow decay and another with prolonged elevation. The group with prolonged BBB permeability had corresponding poorer outcomes. Conclusions: Small numbers prevent statistical comparison, but trajectory modeling identified a number of phenotypes with plausible pathobiological significance. In particular the technique revealed a group of patients with secondary serum NSE release and another with sustained BBB permeability. Such groups seem to relate to injury profile and outcome suggesting biological relevance. To our knowledge this is the first use of an unsupervised clustering technique in kinetic phenotype discovery. References: [1] Ercole A, Thelin EP, Holst A, Bellander BM, Nelson DW. Kinetic modelling of serum S100b after traumatic brain injury. BMC Neurol. 2016;16:93. [2] Thelin EP, Zeiler FA, Ercole A, Mondello S, Büki A, Bellander BM, Helmy A, Menon DK, Nelson DW. Serial Sampling of Serum Protein Biomarkers for Monitoring Human Traumatic Brain Injury Dynamics: A Systematic Review. Front Neurol. 2017;8:300.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it