The Effect of Interlayer Cations on the Magnetic Properties of the Mixed-Metal Pnictide Oxides: A<sub>2</sub>MnZn<sub>2</sub>As<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (A = Sr, Ba)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The new pnictide oxide Sr 2 MnZn 2 As 2 O 2 is reported. The crystal structure of this compound consists of a 1:1 intergrowth of square-planar MnO 2 2 - layers and ThCr 2 Si 2 -type Zn 2 As 2 2 - layers interspersed by Sr cations. This compound has been prepared by sintering the stoichiometric ratio of SrO, Mn, Zn, and As in a fused-silica ampule under 0.2 atm of Ar at 1000 °C for 1 week. The sample quality has been examined by Rietveld refinement of the powder X-ray diffraction data, and the transition metal site (2a and 4d) selectivity has been analyzed by Rietveld refinement of powder neutron diffraction data. Furthermore, effects of this structural order on the magnetic susceptibility and interaction between the magnetic layers have been analyzed by temperature-dependent magnetization measurements. The magnetic structures of both phases, A 2 MnZn 2 As 2 O 2 (A = Sr, Ba), have been investigated by temperature-dependent powder neutron diffraction. The Ba analogue exhibits two-dimensional short-range order below about 40 K, whereas for the Sr analogue, no evidence for either long- or short-range order was found over the 2θ range investigated down to 4 K. The results of these characterizations are compared with those of the previously studied phase, Sr 2 Mn 3 As 2 O 2 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".