The effect of soft repulsive interactions on the diffusion of particles in quasi-one-dimensional channels: A hopping time approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fluids confined to quasi-one-dimensional channels exhibit a dynamic crossover from single file diffusion to normal diffusion as the channel becomes wide enough for particles to hop past each other. In the crossover regime, where hopping events are rare, the diffusion coefficient in the long time limit can be related to a hopping time that measures the average time it takes for a particle to escape the local cage formed by its neighbors. In this work, we show that a transition state theory (TST) that calculates the free energy barrier for two particles attempting to pass each other in the small system isobaric ensemble is able to quantitatively predict the hopping time in a system of two-dimensional soft repulsive disks [U(rij)=(σ/rij)α] confined to a hard walled channel over a range of channel radii and degrees of particle softness measured in terms of 1/α. The free energy barrier exhibits a maximum at intermediate values of α that moves to smaller values of 1/α (harder particles) as the channel becomes narrower. However, the presence of the maximum is only observed in the hopping times for wide channels because the interaction potential dependence of the kinetic prefactor plays an increasingly important role for narrower channels. We also begin to explore how our TST approach can be used to optimize and control dynamics in confined quasi-one-dimensional fluids.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".