Syntheses of 4-[1-(2-deoxy-β-<scp>D</scp>-ribofuranosyl)]-derivatives of 2-substituted-5-fluoroaniline: "cytosine replacement" analogs of deoxycytidine for evaluation as anticancer and antihuman immunodeficiency virus (anti-HIV) agents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A group of 4-[1-(2-deoxy-β-D-ribofuranosyl)]-derivatives of 5-fluoroaniline possessing a variety of aryl C-2 substituents (6a R = H, 6b R = F, 6c R = Me) were synthesized. Accordingly, a Heck-type coupling reaction of the 4-iodoaniline derivatives (13ac) with the bis(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)glycal (11) in the presence of Pd(OAc)2 and Ph3As, followed by removal of the tert-butyldimethylsilyl protection groups using n-Bu4N+F-, yielded the corresponding 4-(β-D-glycero-pentofuran-3-ulos-1-yl)aniline derivatives (14ac) having a C-3 C=O in the sugar ring. Reduction of the C-3 C=O compounds (14ac) using NaB(OAc)3H afforded the target 4-[1-(2-deoxy-β-D-ribofuranosyl)]-derivatives of the respective 2-substituted-5-fluoroaniline (6ac). The deoxycytidine mimic, 3-fluoro-4-[1-(2-deoxy-β-D-ribofuranosyl)]aniline (6a), in which the cytosine ring of deoxycytidine is replaced by a 4-(3-fluoroaniline) ring system, was inactive as an anticancer agent against a variety of tumor cell lines, and as an antihuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1, HIV-2) agent. The failure of this unnatural deoxycytidine mimic (6a) to exhibit anticancer-antiviral activity may be due to its inability to undergo phosphorylation by host cell- and virus-induced kinases.Key words: fluoroanilines, deoxycytidine mimics, anticancer-antihuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV) evaluation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".