MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The clinical significance of lower limb tremors

2019· article· en· W2950422235 on OpenAlexafffund
Rajasumi Rajalingam, David P. Breen, Robert Chen, Susan H. Fox, Lorraine V. Kalia, Renato P. Munhoz, Elizabeth Slow, Antonio P. Strafella, Anthony E. Lang, Alfonso Fasano

Bibliographic record

VenueParkinsonism & Related Disorders · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsOntario Brain InstituteUniversity of TorontoToronto Western HospitalUniversity Health Network
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeUniversity of California, IrvineBristol-Myers Squibb CanadaOntario Brain InstitutePhysicians' Services Incorporated FoundationCanada Foundation for InnovationDystonia Medical Research Foundation CanadaOak Tree Philanthropic FoundationAllerganInternational Parkinson and Movement Disorder SocietyW. Garfield Weston FoundationAbbVieFondation Brain CanadaParkinson Society CanadaMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's ResearchJohns Hopkins UniversitySunovionAmerican Academy of NeurologyCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchWeston Brain InstituteGeneral ElectricNational Institutes of HealthMedtronicNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Parkinson Foundation
KeywordsLower limbMedicineUpper limbEssential tremorPostural tremorPhysical medicine and rehabilitationRating scalePhysical therapyPsychologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueParkinsonism & Related DisordersSame topicNeurological disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207