MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950493376

Engineering and Environmental Assessment of Foam Glass Lightweight Aggregate for Pavement Application

2019· dissertation· en· W2950493376 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yassaman Yousefi

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRecycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAggregate (composite)Civil engineeringGeotechnical engineeringEnvironmental scienceEngineeringMaterials scienceWaste managementComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Foam-Glass Lightweight Aggregate (FG-LWA) is an innovative lightweight material based 95% on waste and recycled glass. Several European countries use this type of material in the pavement structure and mainly as lightweight fill material. The major advantage of the FG-LWA is being more than 10 times lighter than traditional mineral aggregates, which makes it an ideal solution in cases where the dead load of the aggregates is an issue. The objective of this thesis is to evaluate and assess the potential of using FG-LWA, as an alternative to other lightweight fill materials such as Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Blocks, in flexible pavements structures. \nPhysical and mechanical properties of two commercially provided types of FG-LWA were previously studied at the CPATT laboratories of the University of Waterloo. To this end, particle size distribution, particle density, water absorption, minimum and maximum dry densities, California Bearing Ratio (CBR), Los Angles (LA) abrasion, resilient modulus, Mico-Deval and freez-thaw resistance of the material were evaluated by Schneider (2016). The results from this previously conducted study are summarized in this thesis and are used to determine whether the FG-LWA material is suitable to be employed as an alternative granular material in pavement construction, and whether it conforms to the requirements of the Ontario Provincial Standard Specification (OPSS) 1010 for granular A, M, O, S and B. \nIn this thesis, it was deemed necessary to further investigate the effect of changes in the manufacturing processes on the formulation and microstructure of the FG-LWA with the aim of enhancing its mechanical properties for pavement construction applications. Therefore, the manufacturing processes were modified to adjust the microstructure (e.g. shapes and sizes of the pores) and phase compositions. Furthermore, in order to produce an enhanced FG-LWA, the application of ceramic colors, other glassy raw materials and glass-ceramics with a controlled microstructure was also investigated in this thesis. Examining the microstructure of the products indicated improvements in the physical characteristics of the enhanced FG-LWA as compared to the original product containing waste glass. Incorporation of coloring oxides in the foam formulation was also examined as an innovative method to increase the mechanical strength of a colorful product. In addition, chemical evaluation was conducted based on the results of leachate test. The results were evaluated thoroughly, and further tests were conducted at the Golder & Associates laboratories, accordingly. \nGiven the considerable economic, environmental and societal impacts related to pavement construction and maintenance activities, it is crucial to evaluate the sustainability of the proposed pavement structure with FG-LWA. Several techniques are available to measure sustainability of a pavement structure. In this thesis, the mechanistic pavement design approach, along with a conceptual Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) model are used to evaluate the effectiveness of using FG-LWA as an alternative lightweight fill material as compared to the commonly used Expanded Polystyrene (EPS). For the purpose of mechanistic evaluation of FG-LWA application in the pavement structure, an existing Ministry of Transportation (MTO) project was re-evaluated and the results were used as the baseline of this study. The re-evaluation consisted of two phases of pavement design. Under phase one, the same pavement structure proposed by the MTO was adopted identically, except that the EPS in the original design was replaced with the same thickness of the FG-LWA material. In the second phase, four scenarios with different structural layer types and thicknesses were studied. The objective of the second phase was to find different, but equivalent, pavement structures with the use of FG-LWA, while achieving equal or smaller values than the original MTO design for the critical strains at the bottom of the asphalt layer and on top of the subgrade layer. To this end, KenPave program was used to determine the stresses and strains in the pavement layers using a multilayer elastic approach. \nFinally, LCA approach was used to quantify the relative environmental impacts of using FG-LWA and EPS in the pavement structure. The SimaPro software program was used to analyze the performance of the products with respect to sustainability measures. Two flexible pavement structures, previously designed at the University of Waterloo for a specific set of traffic and climatic conditions (Schneider, 2016), were used in the LCA study. The first pavement structure, considered as the reference scenario, used Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) as lightweight fill material. In the second scenario, the EPS was replaced by FG-LWA, and thicknesses of all other layers (i.e. asphalt concrete and granular layers) were determined using the AASHTO 93 Pavement Design Approach, hence the two pavement structures could be assumed equivalent and structurally comparable. The environmental impact categories considered in the LCA studies included: Ozone depletion potential, global warming potential, acidification potential, eutrophication potential, carcinogens, noncarcinogens, smog potential, respiratory effects, ecotoxicity, and fossil fuel depletion. The impacts are calculated using the characterization factors from the TRACI 2.1 LCA model. Two methods of manufacturing foam glass are evaluated, namely using electricity versus natural gas in Ontario. Based on this comparison, it was determined that it is feasible to transfer the new foam glass technologies to Canada’s road network instead of using other non-environmentally friendly materials. The results indicate that FG-LWA can be used as a light fill material in the flexible pavement structure to achieve better or equivalent structural capacity as compared to the traditional EPS. The environmental impacts assessments also indicate lower emission level and environmental impacts when using FG-LWA instead of EPS for pavement construction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicRecycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials productionFrench-language works237,207