Social – Cultural Deviation of the Creative Environment: a Conceptual Approach to the Phenomenon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article discusses the main theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of deviation.It is revealed that the phenomenon of social reality deviation is still not well understood.The need for a conceptual approach to form an idea of deviation in the creative environment is indicated.It is substantiated that it is possible to form ideas about the creative elite as a special social space on the basis of using Narrative as an interdisciplinary methodological construct in modern social sciences.It has been established that an integral part of any social system, its essential characteristics, its necessary and regular components are norms and deviations.It is substantiated that the functional characteristics of the representatives of the creative environment are the organizing force that makes any society a coherent sociocultural system.The outline of socio-cultural factors of deviation can be distinguished from the following.Each deviation determinants form a kind of "deviantogenic complex" in which the behavior of a particular individual of the creative environment under the influence of certain circumstances depends to a large extent on a complex of individual characteristics: nature, temperament, intellectual, volitional, emotional peculiarities, conditions of socialization, education, educational level, etc .; as well as from his social environment.In the conclusions it turns out that from the presented conceptual approach it follows that as a phenomenon, deviation can not be explained "from itself," but only from the standpoint of the socio-cultural whole, in the context of the whole structure -a society whose substance forms a set of social relations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.036 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".