The Impact of Environmental Sensing Strategies on the Organizational Effectiveness: Evidence from Jordan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of study is to identifying the impact of environmental sensing strategies on the organizational effectiveness among Jordanian commercial banks. In order to achieve the study objective, a questionnaire was designed and distributed to 175-members study community from the managerial level (director, deputy director and head of department). The appropriate statistical methods were used to analyze the data.     The result of the study reveals that, the level of applying environmental sensing strategies in Jordanian commercial banks has reached a high level. The level of organizational effectiveness in Jordanian commercial banks, has also reached a high level. There is a statistically significant impact of environmental sensing strategies (flexibility strategy, containment strategy, and forecasting strategy) on the organizational effectiveness as a whole and on its dimensions, individually, (availability of information, stability).    The study reached a number of recommendations, the most important are: creating a system of incentives and rewards for the employees to motivate them to work and to demonstrate distinguished abilities to interpret and clarify the information in a way that serves the organization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".