Predicted High-Energy Molecules: Helical All-Nitrogen and Helical Nitrogen-Rich Ring Clusters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Helical all-nitrogen and nitrogen-rich ring clusters, new types of potential high-energy molecules, were investigated in the computational study reported here. Stable helical all-nitrogen clusters N26 and N46 and nitrogen-rich helical structure N26H16 formed by fused six-membered rings were found and characterized as proper energy minima by having real frequencies for all eigenvectors of the Hessian matrix. Furthermore, the stability of [6] N-ring helix was studied by calculating the barrier of dissociation reaction. The potential of these type molecules as high-energy density materials was studied. For a better intuitive understanding of the unusual bonding patterns, the molecular isodensity contour (MIDCO) surfaces for [6] N-ring helix and [6] N-helicene were compared at some characteristic density threshold values of 0.20, 0.32, and 0.35 au. As indicated at these threshold values of the isodensity surfaces, the bonds of all-nitrogen clusters appear stronger than those of nitrogen-rich clusters. Apparently, the nitrogen-rich clusters are of higher energy than the all-nitrogen structures, especially if one takes into account the energy balance of bonds involving hydrogen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".