MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950545869 · doi:10.22215/etd/2018-13359

Pairwise Estimating Equations for the Analysis of Linked Data

2018· dissertation· en· W2950545869 on OpenAlexaff
Abel Dasylva

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicData Quality and Management
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
KeywordsPairwise comparisonRecord linkageComputer scienceCovariateLinkage (software)Independence (probability theory)Data miningStatisticsEconometricsMathematicsMachine learningSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In official statistics record linkage is an important activity, which consists in identifying records from the same individual in one or many files. It is used to combine data sources including admistrative, survey or big data sources. In practice, record linkage is subject to linkage errors when it relies on quasi-identifiers, such as names and demographic variables, which are nonunique and recorded with errors. Accounting for these errors is an important but challenging problem. In this work, two methods are described for the primary analysis of such data, i.e. an analysis by someone with

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.545
GPT teacher head0.550
Teacher spread0.005 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicData Quality and ManagementFrench-language works237,207