MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950571660 · doi:10.1093/cdn/nzz036.p13-025-19

Development and Validation of a Fecal Extraction Procedure for the Assessment of Multiple Fecal Biomarkers of Intestinal Inflammation (P13-025-19)

2019· article· en· W2950571660 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicInflammation biomarkers and pathways
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFecesExtraction (chemistry)InflammationChemistryChromatographyBiologyImmunologyMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fecal biomarkers have emerged as an important tool to assess intestinal inflammation and permeability. Commonly measured biomarkers include calprotectin (CP), myeloperoxidase (MPO), alpha-1-antitrypsin (AAT) and neopterin (NEO). We sought to develop a simple, fast and cost-effective single extraction procedure for use in determining all four biomarkers of interest. The applicability and sensitivity of this procedure for use in healthy adults was examined. Sample extraction buffers and methods including sample weight, dilution, homogenization and centrifugation were all considered in the development of a single extraction procedure. An extraction buffer that included phosphate-buffered saline, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, bovine serum albumin and Tween 20 was used to extract fecal samples. To assess the applicability and sensitivity of the single extraction procedure, concentrations of CP, MPO, AAT and NEO were measured using commercially available sandwich ELISA kits, according to manufacturer’s instructions. CP, MPO and AAT concentrations were measured in fecal samples of healthy adults (aged 50–80 years, n = 85) and found to be comparable to findings of previously published studies in healthy populations. Mean concentrations of CP and AAT were 3.6 ± 3.8 μg/g of wet weight (range 0.14–18.0 μg/g) and 2.3 ± 0.73 μg/g (range 0.76–5.2 μg/g), respectively. Mean fecal MPO concentrations were 135 ± 24 ng/g (range 3–1290 ng/g). NEO concentrations were examined in a subset of healthy adults (n = 10), with mean concentrations of 18 ± 1 ng/g (range 17–20 ng/g). We demonstrated the efficacy of a single extraction procedure used to assess multiple fecal biomarkers of intestinal inflammation. This simple, fast and inexpensive extraction method will facilitate the determination of multiple fecal biomarkers which is critical in validating their use as clinical or predictive biomarkers of intestinal inflammation. Supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service (ARS), under Agreement No. 58–1950-4–003, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Canadian Institutes of Health Research Postdoctoral Fellowship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.460

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it