MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950574274 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200047

Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Avena based on the nuclear Pgk1 gene

2018· article· en· W2950574274 on OpenAlexaff
Yuanying Peng, Pingping Zhou, Jun Zhao, Junzhuo Li, Shikui Lai, Nicholas A. Tinker, Shu Liao, Honghai Yan

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Reproductive Biology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersEarmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research SystemNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaBrigham Young UniversityU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsGenomeBiologyPolyploidPloidyPhylogenetic treeGeneticsNuclear genePhylogeneticsEvolutionary biologyGenome sizeGeneHaplotypeGenome evolutionAllele

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The phylogenetic relationships among 76 Avena taxa, representing 14 diploids, eight tetraploids, and four hexaploids were investigated by using the nuclear plastid 3-phosphoglycerate kinase gene (Pgk1). A significant deletion (131 bp) was detected in all the C genome homoeologues which reconfirmed a major structural divergence between the A and C genomes. Phylogenetic analysis indicated the Cp genome is more closely related to the polyploid species than is the Cv genome. Two haplotypes of Pgk1 gene were obtained from most of the AB genome tetraploids. Both types of the barbata group showed a close relationship with the As genome diploid species, supporting the hypothesis that both the A and B genomes are derived from an As genome. Two haplotypes were also detected in A. agadiriana, which showed close relationships with the As genome diploid and the Ac genome diploid, respectively, emphasizing the important role of the Ac genome in the evolution of A. agadiriana. Three homoeologues of the Pgk1 gene were detected in five hexaploid accessions. The homoeologues that might represent the D genome were tightly clustered with the tetraploids A. maroccana and A. murphyi, but did not show a close relationship with any extant diploid species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONESame topicPlant Reproductive BiologyFrench-language works237,207