MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950696033 · doi:10.59697/jtik.v2i2.659

SISTEM APLIKASI PEMBAYARAN SERVICE DAN PENJUALAN SPARE PART SEPEDA MOTOR HONDA PADA CV. ANEKA TEKNIK BINJAI

2018· article· id· W2950696033 on OpenAlexaff
Damayanti Damayanti, Indah Ambarita

Bibliographic record

VenueJTIK (Jurnal Teknik Informatika Kaputama) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicMultimedia Learning Systems
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesComputer scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Teknologi memberikan peranan penting dalam dunia usaha, demikian halnya peranan sebuah sistem dalam mengawasi dan mengendalikan kegiatan pembayaran dan penjualan pada sebuah perusahaan. Dealer CV. Aneka Teknik merupakan perusahaan yang bergerak dalam bidang penjualan, pemeliharaan dan suku cadang sepeda motor Honda (SMH). Sebagian dari pengolahan data di dealer CV. Aneka teknik ini masih dilakukan secara manual, sehingga banyak permasalahan yang timbul, seperti halnya banyaknya waktu yang dibutuhkan untuk pembuatan laporan, tingkat keakurasian yang kurang serta informasi yang dihasilkan tidak bisa langsung didapatkan. Penelitian ini merancang sebuah sistem pembayaran jasa servis dan penjualan suku cadang yang terkomputerisasi. Sistem yang dirancang menggunakan data konsumen, data sepeda motor, dan data sparepart. Sistem yang dibangun ini digunakan oleh kasir, yang bertugas untuk mengelola atau mengolah data pembayaran servis konsumen, data transaksi penjualan dan stok suku cadang sepeda motor. Sistem ini dirancang dengan menggunakan bahasa pemrograman Visual Basic 2010. Penelitian ini dapat memudahkan kegiatan transaksi pembayaran jasa servis dan penjualan sparepart serta dapat memudahkan karyawan CV. Aneka Teknik dalam menyusun laporan konsumen servis dan sparepart pada bengkel CV. Aneka Teknik.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1500.079

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJTIK (Jurnal Teknik Informatika Kaputama)Same topicMultimedia Learning SystemsFrench-language works237,207