Beamforming for Multiuser Massive MIMO Systems: Digital versus Hybrid Analog-Digital
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper designs a novel hybrid (a mixture of analog and digital) beamforming and examines the relation between the hybrid and digital beamformings for downlink multiuser massive multiple input multiple output (MIMO) systems. We assume that perfect channel state information is available only at the transmitter and we consider the total sum rate maximization problem. For this problem, the hybrid beamforming is designed indirectly by considering a weighed sum mean square error (WSMSE) minimization problem incorporating the solution of digital beamforming which is obtained from the block diagonalization technique. The resulting WSMSE problem is solved by applying the theory of compressed sensing. The relation between the hybrid and digital beamformings is studied numerically by varying different parameters, such as the number of radio frequency (RF) chains, analog to digital converters (ADCs) and multiplexed symbols. Computer simulations reveal that for the given number of RF chains and ADCs, the performance gap between digital and hybrid beamformings can be decreased by decreasing the number of multiplexed symbols. Moreover, for the given number of multiplexed symbols, increasing the number of RF chains and ADCs will increase the total sum rate of the hybrid beamforming which is expected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".