Supervisor Fuzzy Logic Controller for HVAC System of S.J Carew Building at Memorial University
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the most important characteristics contributing to the thermal management efficiency of commercial, industrial, institutional or home environments is the optimal functioning of HVAC (heating, ventilation, air conditioning) systems. In addition to using supervisor controllers for balancing comfort level in a building, the majority of today’s HVACs employ nonlinear time variance controllers when dealing with a variety of disturbances. This paper investigates both current and potential HVAC systems at Memorial University’s S. J. Carew building, St. John’s, Newfoundland. The study investigates the viability of algorithm-based supervisor fuzzy logic controllers (SFLC) for the control of the building’s four air-handling units (AHUs) used to manage the interior environment. Along with temperature, the SFLCs also control the AHUs’ fan speeds and CO2 concentrations modifying hot water and air flow rates. This work presents models of damper positions, fan speeds and globe valves that have been built in accordance with current rates of air and hot water flow in the S. J. Carew building. Based on these specifications, a novel method of SFLC adaptation using fuzzy rules has been devised. The novel system aims to better balance the performance level of the Carew building’s HVAC system on a floor-by-floor basis. The overall results indicate better overall thermal comfort levels and enhanced cost-effectiveness when using the SFLC redesign.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".