MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2950778246 · doi:10.82308/2215

Characterization of ß-arrestins trafficking and signaling functions on G protein-coupled receptors

2015· article· en· W2950778246 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Étienne Khoury

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsArrestinG protein-coupled receptorEndosomeCell biologyEndocytic cycleBiologySignal transductionHeterotrimeric G proteinScaffold proteinG proteinReceptorRhodopsin-like receptorsG protein-coupled receptor kinaseEndocytosisBiochemistryAgonistMetabotropic receptorIntracellular

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The heptahelical G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest, most versatile superfamily of cell surface receptors and constitute the most common target for many therapeutic drugs. They participate in various physiological processes via signaling transduction, mainly induced by heterotrimeric G proteins. Following activation, these 7-transmembrane receptors recruit β-arrestin for endocytosis. Beta-arrestins will directlyassociate GPCRs to several components of the endocytic machinery, such as clathrin and adaptor protein 2 (AP-2), allowing the receptor to internalize. Over the years, β-arrestins were shown to also act as signaling adaptors upon binding to agonist-occupied GPCRs; however, the mechanism regulating receptor/β-arrestin complexes in endosomes was not yet addressed. Based on a previous study where we showed that β-arrestin serves as a scaffolding protein for several signaling effectors (e.g. MAPK) in the endosomes, we hypothesized that endosomal MAPK activity would be necessary to maintain the GPCR/β-arrestin-2 complex, thus regulating receptor trafficking. Our first study revealed a putative phosphorylating MAPK motif (Thr178) in β-arrestin-2 suggesting that endosomal MAPK activity is involved in such process. Using biochemical assays and FRAP (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching) approach to assess the life-time of bradykinin B2 receptor (B2R)/β-arrestin-2 endosomal complexes, we showed that the MAPK putative site in β-arrestin-2 is involved in regulating the association between the arrestin and its receptor. The role of β-arrestin-2 ‘hinge’ domain was tested for such effect, and using arrestin mutants demonstrated distinct behaviours between β-arrestin-2 species on GPCRs trafficking and agonist mediated receptor signaling. This study highlights a strong correlation between MAPKsignaling and the regulation of endosomal GPCR/β-arrestin-2 interactions. In addition to the ‘hinge’ domain, structural studies showed that the polar core, as well as the arrestins loops, were also crucial for β-arrestin activation. Based on the crystal structure of β-arrestin-1, a virtual screen was then conducted in order to identify aselective pharmacological inhibitor of β-arrestin-2. Results showed a unique compound, namely UM0012685 which firstly, blocked V2-vasopressin receptor (V2R) endocytosis; Secondly, inhibited β-arrestin recruitment; Thirdly, decreased the stability of the receptor and β-arrestin-2 endosomal complexes and finally inhibited β-arrestin-2-dependent MAPK activation upon agonist stimulation of the V2R. This compound was also used as a tool to determine β-arrestins trafficking function on β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) recycling. These results uncover a better understanding of the underlying mechanism regulating β-arrestin in the endosomes as well as the intracellular trafficking modulation of GPCRs. Our findings also reveal a useful tool to investigate the multifunctional aspect of β-arrestins in the cell.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling→French-language works237,207→