MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950782771 · doi:10.25071/ryr.v2i0.40360

Mirvish Towers in Land Use and Urban Development Context

2017· article· en· W2950782771 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bishoi Shinoda

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue YOUR Review (York Online Undergraduate Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderground infrastructure and sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDowntownEntertainmentContext (archaeology)Urban planningNewspaperIdentity (music)Environmental planningMegacityGeographyPolitical scienceCivil engineeringAdvertisingBusinessEngineeringEconomyArchaeologyAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Mirvish and Gehry Trio Towers are a currently proposed development that threatens the cultural identity of the entertainment district in Downtown Toronto. The development highlights the role of condofication and new mega projects in reshaping the downtown core as well as in giving an international identity to the city. The research included field observation to the site and its activities. It also included intensive research for primary resources whether newspaper or city planning documents. It can be concluded that the development proposes loss over gain due to the unsolved conflicts. The pressure by the owner and the international architect leaves the city planners hesitant about their decision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue YOUR Review (York Online Undergraduate Research)Same topicUnderground infrastructure and sustainabilityFrench-language works237,207